Efficacy-Pivotal
Efficacy-OLE
Safety
The primary objective of the phase 3 OLE was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of NGENLA. Any inference of clinical significance should be interpreted with caution as the study was open label and lacked a comparator arm.
These efficacy data represent the pivotal study year (year 1), as well as the first 3 years of the phase 3 OLE (year 2, year 3, and year 4). Statistical analyses of the data for Years 2, 3 and 4 are descriptive only, and no formal hypothesis testing was performed.3
The primary objective of the phase 3 OLE was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of NGENLA. Any inference of clinical significance should be interpreted with caution as the study was open label and lacked a comparator arm.
These efficacy data represent the pivotal study year (year 1), as well as the first 3 years of the phase 3 OLE (year 2, year 3, and year 4). Statistical analyses of the data for Years 2, 3 and 4 are descriptive only, and no formal hypothesis testing was performed.3
The primary objective of the phase 3 OLE was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of NGENLA. Any inference of clinical significance should be interpreted with caution as the study was open label and lacked a comparator arm.
These efficacy data represent the pivotal study year (year 1), as well as the first 3 years of the phase 3 OLE (year 2, year 3, and year 4). Statistical analyses of the data for Years 2, 3 and 4 are descriptive only, and no formal hypothesis testing was performed.3
AE, adverse event; OLE, open-label extension.
Adverse reactions that are medically related were grouped to a single preferred term.
Once-weekly administration with a multidose, prefilled pen.◊
Support for your patients throughout their treatment journey.